I need replies for these two assigment with 200 words each one

1.A healthcare proxy refers to an individual assigned a right to make healthcare decisions for a patient or someone unable to speak for themselves. For instance, parents are allowed to make healthcare decisions for their children, while at times, patients with cognitive disabilities can appoint someone to make crucial decisions for them. In other cases, researchers and scientists rely on proxies to provide information regarding their subjects since they cannot interact directly with the study subjects (Bravo et al., 2018). Through this process, the researchers can indirectly derive information from a third party and determine the results’ accuracy. In some cases, such as the hospital setting, doctors can try to understand the association between diseases and their causes by getting information from a parent or a third party. In other situations, the doctor can link the symptoms to other factors, for instance, if many patients are admitted with waterborne diseases that could correlate to environmental factors such as unsanitary water.

This is not to say that the proxy subjective health evaluation is done without the assumptions and, in turn, ramifications that accompany them. A common assumption is that the proxy or parent-led reporting is valid and in tune with the underlying variables or factors being measured. This ensures that accuracy is maintained at all times, and the information the scientists provide can inform their research and future findings (Bastani, 2021). As with the hospital-led proxy, for instance, the assumption is that the information provided by the proxy has not been affected by any other external factors. Suppose a parent informs the doctor that their child is having diarrhea because of dirty water they drank. The assumption made is that the diarrhea is unlikely to be caused by other factors, such as an underlying infection or allergic reaction.

Several ramifications can arise from pro-led subjective health status or evaluation measures for children. For instance, the parents may go through decisional conflict, which means they are uncertain about the best course of action, especially when the interventions are risky, or outcomes are uncertain. This can end up stressing the parties involved and, in turn, delay the entire process. In some settings, such as critical care, the proxy will likely undergo emotional distress, anxiety, and depression as they try to make the best decisions for their loved ones. However, this assumption that decisional conflict may delay the process has been questioned, as in some cases, this would mean that the proxy takes to deliberate and make informed decisions (Shepherd, 2022).

Another common ramification is that errors may result in the findings if the data presented needs to be more accurate. This can lead to findings and interventions that could be better for the patient. It is crucial that all the factors are put into consideration when making informed decisions. In other instances where the patient is old or mentally incapacitated, it is essential to put the psychological aspect into consideration (Kroenke et al., 2022)

2.A complicated and crucial part of healthcare is having substitute subjective health status or evaluation metrics for kids or people who are unable to communicate for themselves. In such cases, healthcare professionals often rely on caregivers, parents, or other individuals close to the patient to provide information about their subjective health status. However, this strategy has underlying presumptions and potential consequences that need to be thoroughly examined.

The caregiver or proxy’s ability to effectively portray the patient’s health state or subjective experience is one of the fundamental assumptions when employing proxy subjective measurements. This presumption is based on the notion that the proxy has a thorough comprehension of the patient’s condition, signs, and requirements. The proxy’s interpretation and the patient’s actual experiences or preferences, however, might differ. This might be the result of disparities in perception, impediments to communication, or prejudices on the part of the proxy.

Another assumption is that the proxy has the best interests of the patient at heart and will act in their favor. While this may generally be the case, there could be situations where the proxy’s own biases, beliefs, or personal interests influence their reporting or decision-making. This can lead to potential inaccuracies or misrepresentation of the patient’s subjective health status.

There are several potential ramifications of relying on proxy subjective measures. Firstly, inaccurate assessments may lead to inappropriate or inadequate interventions or treatments. If the proxy’s report does not fully capture the patient’s true experiences or symptoms, it can result in a misdiagnosis or improper management of their health condition. This can have negative consequences on the patient’s well-being and overall healthcare outcomes.

Additionally, the use of proxy subjective measures may inadvertently undermine the autonomy and agency of the individual. Children or those unable to speak for themselves may have their own unique perspectives, preferences, or priorities that may differ from those of their proxies. Relying solely on proxies without considering the patient’s own voice and experiences can perpetuate a lack of person-centered care and potentially disregard the individual’s preferences and needs.

However, it is important to note that using proxies is often a necessary and practical approach in healthcare contexts where direct patient input is not feasible or reliable. Caregivers or proxies can provide valuable information about the patient’s behavior, physical signs, and overall functioning. Careful attention must be given to establishing strong lines of communication and trust with proxies, ensuring they are well-informed about the patient’s condition and actively involving them in decision-making processes.

To mitigate the limitations and potential ramifications, healthcare professionals should seek to complement proxy subjective measures with triangulation of data from different sources. This can include incorporating objective clinical measures, observations, and, whenever possible, involving the patient directly in the evaluation process (e.g., through age-appropriate assessment tools or involving those with communication impairments through augmentative and alternative communication methods).

In conclusion, it is important to be mindful of the underlying assumptions and potential repercussions when utilizing proxy subjective health status indicators for children or people who are unable to speak for themselves. To guarantee accurate assessments and improve healthcare outcomes, it is crucial to strike a balance between the participation of proxies and direct patient input, triangulation of data, and the promotion of person-centered care.



Assignment 1: Healthcare Proxy and Subjective Health Evaluation

A healthcare proxy serves as an essential mechanism for ensuring that individuals who are unable to make healthcare decisions for themselves receive appropriate care and treatment. Whether it involves parents making decisions for their children or appointed proxies for patients with cognitive disabilities, the proxy’s role is to act in the best interest of the patient. Researchers and doctors also rely on proxies to gather information about their subjects or patients indirectly, enabling them to make informed decisions and draw accurate conclusions.

However, this reliance on proxies comes with certain assumptions and potential ramifications. One key assumption is that the information provided by proxies is valid and aligned with the actual experiences and conditions of the patients. Ensuring accuracy is crucial to avoid errors in diagnoses and treatment plans. Another assumption is that proxies are acting solely in the patient’s best interests, but biases or conflicts of interest may sometimes influence their decisions.

Several potential ramifications arise from the use of proxies in healthcare decision-making. Decisional conflict may occur, causing uncertainty and stress for the proxy, especially when faced with risky or uncertain interventions. Additionally, errors in the information provided by proxies can lead to suboptimal findings and interventions for patients. To mitigate these issues, it is essential to involve proxies in the decision-making process, ensuring they are well-informed and supported. It is also important to consider the psychological aspects of the patient, especially in cases of mental incapacity.

In conclusion, healthcare proxies play a crucial role in ensuring proper care for individuals who cannot advocate for themselves. However, to maintain accuracy and improve outcomes, it is vital to address the assumptions and potential ramifications associated with proxy-led healthcare decisions and involve proxies as informed participants in the process.

Assignment 2: Proxy Subjective Health Status in Healthcare

Proxy subjective health status evaluation is a valuable tool in healthcare, particularly when dealing with children or individuals unable to communicate their own health experiences. However, there are underlying assumptions and potential consequences that require careful consideration.

The primary assumption in using proxies is that they can accurately represent the patient’s health state and subjective experiences. But, differences in perception, communication barriers, or personal biases may lead to variations between the proxy’s report and the patient’s actual experiences.

Another assumption is that proxies always act in the best interests of the patient. While this is generally true, personal biases or beliefs can influence their reporting or decision-making, leading to potential inaccuracies.

These assumptions can have significant ramifications. Inaccurate assessments may result in improper treatments or misdiagnoses, adversely affecting the patient’s health and well-being. Moreover, relying solely on proxies may disregard the individual’s unique perspectives and preferences, undermining their autonomy and person-centered care.

To mitigate these limitations, healthcare professionals should complement proxy subjective measures with diverse data sources. Objective clinical measures and direct patient input can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the patient’s health status. Involving proxies in the decision-making process, while actively considering the patient’s voice, fosters a patient-centric approach.

In conclusion, proxy subjective health status evaluation is a practical approach in certain healthcare situations. However, it requires awareness of its limitations and potential consequences. By combining information from multiple sources and actively involving proxies and patients in decision-making, healthcare professionals can ensure more accurate assessments and patient-centered care.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Boom Grades
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Absolutely LOVE having help especially from the person who wrote this last one. THANK YOU
Customer 452529, November 19th, 2021
English 101
perfect! thanks!
Customer 452543, December 1st, 2021
world civilization
Thank you for the quick response
Customer 452509, June 27th, 2021
Exercise Science
Thank you so much for your time.
Customer 452545, December 5th, 2021
Religious studies
I recommend this service they always help. I got an A in this project thanks.
Customer 452507, October 5th, 2021
Classic English Literature
Awesome Job... you are the best!
Customer 452531, November 27th, 2021
Thank you so much this looks great !!!!
Customer 452585, November 4th, 2023
English comp
Got a 94% thank you!
Customer 452509, June 27th, 2021
Great content.
Customer 452549, February 8th, 2022
english comp
Thank you for all your hard time.
Customer 452509, June 27th, 2021
Public Health
Thank you so much !!
Customer 452589, November 28th, 2023
Classic English Literature
Great Work as Usual. Thank you . I received an A on the paper!
Customer 452531, November 9th, 2021
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat